This article traces the normative development in international criminal law on children born of war (CBOW). In a historical cross-contextual approach, primary and secondary sources, and particularly jurisprudence of international criminal courts from 1945 to today, are interpreted in reference to political psychologist Inger Skjelsbæk’s epistemology conceptualising conflict-related sexual and reproductive violence as carrying essentialist, structuralist and socio-constructivist implications.

The edited volume „Children and Youth at Risk in Times of Transition. International and Interdisciplinary Perspectives” edited by Baard Herman Borge, Elke Kleinau and Ingvill Constanze Ødegaard was published online by De Gruyter. The book includes chapters by EuroWARCHILD team members Ingvill Constanze Ødegaard and Lina Stotz.

The growing attention to CBOW in research and advocacy has contributed to a greater awareness of this group . Yet, there are clear discrepancies between how CBOW are conceptualized by academics and how they are approached by policy makers. This divide risks hampering the support CBOW urgently need.
Image by Andy Nelson via flickr. https://www.flickr.com/photos/andynelson/

Over nine months have passed since Russia’s attack on Ukraine. Several of the first Ukrainian women who became pregnant as a result of wartime sexual violence have now given birth to children who were conceived as a result of this violence. More will be born in the coming months.
Photo: Kelly Sikkema / Unsplash

After being systematically raped by Russian soldiers, countless Ukrainian women are now becoming mothers. The “Children Born of War” might face a multitude of problems that should be addressed now.

A recent UN report published by the Secretary General in late January is one of the first to focus exclusively on women and girls who become pregnant as a result of sexual violence in conflict and on children born of war.